Comparison of the efficacy of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery with conventional thoracic surgery on esophageal cancer and its influence on pulmonary function
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008?6315.2017.09.007
- VernacularTitle:胸腹腔镜联合手术与传统开胸手术治疗食管癌的效果及对肺功能的影响比较
- Author:
Xiang′an WANG
;
Guobin FENG
;
Jun ZHU
;
Yongzhi LIU
;
Yi SHEN
;
- Keywords:
Esophageal cancer;
Thoracoscopy and laparoscopy;
Thoracic surgery;
Pulmonary function
- From:
Clinical Medicine of China
2017;33(9):797-801
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the effect of thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery with conventional thoracic surgery on esophageal cancer and its influence on pulmonary function. Methods Ninety?four patients with esophageal cancer treated in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College from March 2010 to March 2016 were selected and were divided into the control group ( 54 cases) and the study group ( 40 cases) according to operation methods. The control group received traditional thoracotomy. The study group received thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery. The operation and pulmonary function indexes were compared. Results The operation time of the patients in the study group was significantly longer than that in the control group ( (218. 1±35. 8) min vs. (192. 3±40. 1) min,t=3. 23,P<0. 05). Intraoperative blood loss of the patients in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group ( (286. 4±83. 5) ml vs. (343. 7 ±96. 7) ml,t=3. 01,P<0. 05) . The number of lymph nodes cleared of the patients was significantly higher in the study group ( (18.0±5.4) node vs. (15.5±4.6) node,t=2.42,P<0.05).Thoracic drainage of the patients in the study group was significantly less than that in the control group ( (650. 3±61. 3) ml vs. (1153. 5 ±133. 7) ml,t=22. 12,P<0. 05). Chest tube pull out time in the study group was significantly earlier than that in the control group ( (5. 1±1. 3) d vs. (8. 0±1. 8) d,t=8. 65,P<0. 05). First exhaust time in the study group was significantly earlier than that in the control group ( (33. 2±6. 7) h vs. (40. 7±7. 3) h,t=5. 10,P<0. 05). Hospital stay in the study group was significantly shorter than that in the control group ( ( 13. 8 ± 2. 8 ) d vs. (18. 2± 3. 6) d, t=6. 42, P<0. 05) . Postoperative complications occurred in 4 cases in the study group, accounting for 10%, significantly lower than that in the control group, 15 cases, 27. 8%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4. 50,P<0. 05) . VC,FEV1 and MVV in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group ( VC:( 81. 5 ± 15. 6 )% vs. ( 42. 3 ± 8. 1 )%;FEV1: ( 85. 7 ± 9. 1 )% vs. ( 43. 6 ±6. 8)%;MVV:(76. 0±8. 9)% vs. (48. 3±7. 6)%,t=15. 83,25. 68,16. 24,P<0. 05). 3?year survival rate of the study group and the control group were 45. 0% (18/40) and 44. 4% (24/54),respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups (χ2 = 0. 01, P> 0. 05 ) . Conclusion Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer has the advantages of small trauma,rapid recovery and low incidence of complications and obvious protective effect on pulmonary function. It is safe and feasible.
