Comparison of sleep quality based on direction of shift rotation in electronics workers.
10.1186/s40557-016-0122-3
- Author:
Youil SHON
1
;
Seungho RYU
;
Byung Seong SUH
;
Soo Geun KIM
;
Won Sool KIM
;
Hee Seung SON
;
Hee Yun KIM
;
Han Seur JEONG
Author Information
1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. sh703.yoo@gmail.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Shiftwork;
Shift rotation;
Sleep quality;
Electronics workers
- MeSH:
Female;
Hospitals, General;
Humans;
Male;
Odds Ratio;
Prevalence
- From:Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
2016;28(1):37-
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have reported the effects of direction of shift rotation on sleep, however, the findings are inconsistent. In this study, we investigated sleep quality related to direction of shift rotation using large-scale data from shiftwork-specific health examinations of electronics workers. METHODS: This study included 4750 electronics workers working in a rotating 3-shift system who completed a medical examination for shift workers survey from January 1 to December 31, 2014, at a general hospital. The subjects were categorized into one of two groups according to direction of shift rotation. We compared sleep quality index between the subjects who worked in forward rotation and backward rotation systems. RESULTS: Backward rotation was positively associated with prevalence of poor sleep quality. In the multivariable-adjusted model, when comparing backward rotation to forward rotation, the odds ratio (OR) with 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) for poor sleep quality was 1.95 (1.58–2.41). After stratifying by gender, the ORs (95 % CIs) for poor sleep quality in male and female was 1.92 (1.47–2.49) and 2.13 (1.47–3.08), respectively. In subgroup analyses, backward rotation was significantly associated with poor sleep quality in workers ≥30 years of age compared with workers <30 years of age (adjusted OR 2.60 vs. 1.89, respectively; P for interaction <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports that a backward rotation system is associated with poor sleep quality. Forward rotation systems should be considered to reduce sleep problems.
