Gap Balancing vs. Measured Resection Technique in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
- Author:
Brian K DAINES
1
;
Douglas A DENNIS
Author Information
- Publication Type:Review
- Keywords: Total knee arthroplasty technique; Gap balancing; Measured resection
- MeSH: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/adverse effects/*methods; Fluoroscopy/methods; Humans; Knee Joint/physiology/surgery; Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods; Treatment Outcome
- From:Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 2014;6(1):1-8
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: A goal of total knee arthroplasty is to obtain symmetric and balanced flexion and extension gaps. Controversy exists regarding the best surgical technique to utilize to obtain gap balance. Some favor the use of a measured resection technique in which bone landmarks, such as the transepicondylar, the anterior-posterior, or the posterior condylar axes are used to determine proper femoral component rotation and subsequent gap balance. Others favor a gap balancing technique in which the femoral component is positioned parallel to the resected proximal tibia with each collateral ligament equally tensioned to obtain a rectangular flexion gap. Two scientific studies have been performed comparing the two surgical techniques. The first utilized computer navigation and demonstrated a balanced and rectangular flexion gap was obtained much more frequently with use of a gap balanced technique. The second utilized in vivo video fluoroscopy and demonstrated a much high incidence of femoral condylar lift-off (instability) when a measured resection technique was used. In summary, the authors believe gap balancing techniques provide superior gap balance and function following total knee arthroplasty.
