Computer-assisted C1-C2 Transarticular Screw Fixation "Magerl Technique" for Atlantoaxial Instability.
- Author:
Masashi UEHARA
1
;
Jun TAKAHASHI
;
Hiroki HIRABAYASHI
;
Hiroyuki HASHIDATE
;
Nobuhide OGIHARA
;
Keijiro MUKAIYAMA
;
Hiroyuki KATO
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Atlantoaxial joint; Atlantoaxial instability; CT-based computer navigation system; C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation
- MeSH: Asian Continental Ancestry Group; Atlanto-Axial Joint; Congenital Abnormalities; Constriction, Pathologic; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Angiography; Neck Pain; Operative Time; Retrospective Studies; Vertebral Artery
- From:Asian Spine Journal 2012;6(3):168-177
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical results of computer-assisted C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for atlantoaxial instability and the usefulness of the navigation system. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: We used a computed tomography (CT)-based computer navigation system in planning and screw insertion in Magerl's procedure, which provides the most rigid atlantoaxial fusion, to avoid risk of vertebral artery (VA) tear by avoiding high-riding VA during screw insertion. METHODS: Twenty patients who underwent atlantoaxial fusion under the CT-based navigation system were studied. The mean observation period was 33.5 months. The evaluated items included the existence of VA stenosis by preoperative magnetic resonance angiography, surgical time, blood loss volume, Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and Ranawat's pain criteria before surgery and at final follow-up, postoperative screw position evaluated by CT, and bony fusion. RESULTS: The mean operation time was 205 minutes, with the mean blood loss volume of 242 ml. The mean JOA score was 11.6 points before surgery and 13.7 at final follow-up. Occipital and/or cervical pain presented before operation was remitted or resolved in all patients. Evaluation of screw insertion by CT revealed correct penetration to atlantoaxial joints, with a perforation rate of 2.6%. There was no complication, including VA tear, and all patients who were followed-up during one year or more after surgery achieved bony fusion. Some subjects who appeared inappropriate for surgery from CT images were assessed as eligible for surgery based on the evaluation results obtained using the navigation system. CONCLUSIONS: It was demonstrated that the CT-based navigation system is an effective support device for Magerl's procedure.
