Comparison and analysis of the operation approach of esophageal carcinoma
- VernacularTitle:食管癌手术径路的比较分析
- Author:
Jianwei DU
;
Lide FANG
;
Feng NI
;
Al ET
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
esophageal carcinoma;
esophactomy;
esophagogastrostomy
- From:China Oncology
1998;0(01):-
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Purpose:To select a better operation approach for esophageal carcinoma. Methods:From 1958 to 1997, 945 patients of the middle third esophageal carcinoma of our hospital were underwent 5 types of operation.namely: left thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy anterolateral and abdomen esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy anterolateral and abdomen and cervical approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; right thoractomy posteriolateral, abdomen and cervical approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy; simple right thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy. The rate of resectability, rate of complication, rate of mortality and rate of survival of the 5 types of operation were using SAS package and significance test of contingency table. Results:The rate of resectability and the rate of 5 year survival in the five groups were 84.19% and 29.00%, 81.69% and 28.57%,83.65% and 26.19%,90.74% and 34.70%, 93.67% and 39.74%, respectively. Conclusions:Right thoracic approach esophagectomy and esophagogastrostomy are considered superior the operation approach of esophageal carcinoma.
