Analysis of the attitude to the LLETZ as a treatment of CIN according to the subspecialty.
- Author:
Yong Tark JEON
1
;
Kyung Joon MIN
;
Byung Chul JEE
;
Yong Beom KIM
;
Kyo Hoon PARK
;
Chang Suk SUH
Author Information
1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. ybkimlh@snubh.org
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
LLETZ;
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia;
Subspecialty
- MeSH:
Age Distribution;
Biopsy;
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia;
Humans;
Seoul;
Uterine Cervicitis
- From:Korean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2005;48(3):669-673
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the clinician's attitude to the large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) according to the subspecialty; gynecologic oncology or not. METHODS: Eighty-one patients who had LLETZ at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from June 2003 to September 2004 were reviewed. The pathologic reports for LLETZ were compared with the results of punch biopsy according to the operator's subspecialty. RESULTS: Gynecologic oncologist had 38 patients (GO group) and non-gynecologic oncologist had 43 patients (NGO group). The age distribution was not different between two groups (40.3 +/- 8.3 in GO group, 42.4 +/- 9.4 in NGO group; p=0.301). The histopathology of punch biopsy and LLETZ correlated well each other in both groups (p=0.01 in both groups). In NGO group, 11 patients (25.6%) had chronic cervicitis or mild dysplasia on punch biopsy while only a patient (2.6%) had mild dysplasia on punch biopsy in GO group. CONCLUSION: This study shows that the non-gynecologic oncologist used LLETZ more frequently in the management of low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than gynecologic oncologist.
