Impact on sexual function of 120 W 2 μm continuous-wave laser vapoenucleation versus and transurethral resection of the prostate
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4904.2014.05.005
- VernacularTitle:120瓦二微米激光前列腺汽化剜除术与经尿道前列腺电切术对性功能影响
- Author:
Yubin WANG
;
Jinkai SHAO
;
Yong'an LV
;
Xiaodong LI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Prostatic hyperplasia;
Transurethral resection of prostate;
Sexual dysfunction,physiological;
2-μm laser,120 W;
Retrograde ejaculation
- From:
Chinese Journal of Postgraduates of Medicine
2014;37(5):13-16
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the impact of 120 W 2 μ m continuous-wave laser vapoenucleation versus and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on sexual function.Methods One hundred and twenty-two patients with BPH were selected,63 cases were treated with 120 W 2 μ m continuous-wave laser vapoenucleation versus(2 μ m laser group),59 cases were treated with TURP(TURP group).International index of erectile function(IIEF) scores and self-made general assessment questions were completed before and 12 months after treatment to determine the impact on sexual function.IIEF scores included erectile function (EF),sexual desire,orgasm,sexual satisfaction and overall satisfaction.Results The IIEF scores difference was no significant before treatment between two groups (P ＞ 0.05).In two groups,there was no significant difference in EF,sexual desire,sexual satisfaction and overall satisfaction score between before treatment and 12 months after treatment(P＞ 0.05),orgasm score 12 months after treatment was significantly lower than that before treatment [2 μm laser group:(5.9 ± 1.5) scores vs.(8.6 ± 2.7) scores;TURP group:(5.5 ± 1.6) scores vs.(8.7 ± 1.8) scores] (P ＜0.05).Multiple linear regression analysis showed that two groups EF score and the international prostate symptom score,quality of life score and Q.~ positive linear correlation.Logistic regression analysis showed that the incidence of retrograde ejaculation and orgasm reduced significantly assoeiated(P ＜ 0.05),as an independent predictor of orgasm reduced after treatment(P ＜ 0.05).Conclusions There is no difference between these two surgical techniques regarding to impact on sex function.No significant EF improvement after surgery in both groups,but these two techniques can significantly decrease the IIEF orgasmic function domain and this is mainly caused by retrograde ejaculation.
