Comparison of the effectiveness between radiofrequency ablation and microwave ablation in treating uterine leiomyoma
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1004-4477.2014.02.011
- VernacularTitle:射频和微波消融对子宫肌瘤疗效的对比观察
- Author:
Li YU
;
Xing'an YANG
;
Gang WANG
;
Junjie DONG
;
Tongwei ZHU
;
Zhiya FENG
;
Huijin ZHAO
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Ultrasonography;
Microwave/therapeutic use;
Catheter ablation;
Uterine neoplasms;
Leiomyoma
- From:
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
2014;23(2):138-142
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the efficiency of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) in treating uterine leiomyoma.Methods The clinical data of thermal ablation with RFA and MWA were retrospectively analyzed in 42 patients.All patients were followed up at least 12 months to observe the therapeutic effects after the treatment.The changes of vital signs and the size of uterine leiomyoma,the score of uterine leiomyoma symptom and quality of Iife(UFS-QOL) were compared after RFA or MWA,the two thermal ablations techniques of clinic efficiency and influence on complications were analyzed.Results 23 patients received treatment of RFA and 19 patients received MWA,the visual analogue scale(VAS)during operation and postoperation were statistically significant differences between the two groups(P ＜0.05).The sizes of uterine leiomyoma were significantly reduced after the thermal ablation,the differences of volume within two groups in different time were statistics significance(P ＜0.05),but there were no statistics significance differences between two groups (P ＞0.05).The symptoms in two groups were improved significantly after treatment and the scores of UFS-QOL were no statistics significance differences between two groups (P ＞0.05).Conclusions Both of RFA and MWA have significant clinic efficiency in treating uterine leiomyoma.Compared with MWA,RFA with lower adverse reactions during operation and postoperation.
