Comparative effect of dorsal slit circumcision and disposable circumcision suture device
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7368.2017.01.011
- VernacularTitle:包皮环切缝合器与背侧切开包皮环切术行包皮环切治疗的疗效比较
- Author:
Bo SONG
;
Shaozhong XIAN
;
Peishan WU
;
Guangqi KONG
- Keywords:
Circumcision,male;
Phimosis;
Surgical stapling
- From:
Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
2017;16(1):54-57
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of disposable circumcision suture device (DCSD) with conventional circumcision in surgical treatment of phimosis and redundant prepuce . Methods One hundred and sixty one patients with phimosis or redundant prepuce were randomly assigned to be treated by circumcision using disposable circumcision suture device ( DCSD group , n =89 ) or conventional circumcision (CC group,n =72),respectively.Results The operation time was (3.8 ± 0.5)min in DCSD group and (31.6 ±2.7)min in CC group (F=71.21,P=0.000),blood loss was 1.0(0.9, 1.2)ml in DCSD group and 6.2(5.7, 7.0)ml in CC group (Z =-10.90,P=0.000).There were no significant differences in intraoperative pain score (1.4 ±0.6 vs.2.9 ±0.8, F=2.08, P=0.151) and wound healing time [(14.0 ±1.3) vs.(16.8 ±2.1) d, F=0.10, P=0.754] between two groups.There was no need to change the dressing for patients in DSCD group 3 days after the operation , while patients in CC group changed dressing 3 times after the operation .No significant differences in postoperative complication rate [10%(9/89) vs.4%(3/72),χ2 =2.04,P=0.153] and satisfaction rate with the penile appearance [98%(87/89) vs.94%(68/72), χ2 =0.47,P=0.494] were found between two groups .Conclusion DCSD exhibits superiority over CC for shorter operation time and less blood loss in circumcision .
