Incidence of secondary surgical procedures after cervical disc arthroplasty compared to fusion: a meta-analysis
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.11.011
- VernacularTitle:颈椎人工椎间盘置换术与前路减压融合固定术再手术率的Meta分析
- Author:
Dongjie JIANG
;
Qingguo GU
;
Zhanchao WANG
;
Xinwei WANG
;
Wen YUAN
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Cervical vertebrae;
Total disc replacement;
Spinal fusion;
Prospective studies;
Randomized controlled trial;
Reoperation;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2015;35(11):1142-1150
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the incidence of secondary surgical procedures after cervical disc arthroplasty vs anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients treated for symptomatic single level cervical spondylosis.Methods An online search of Pubmed, Medline, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM database, Wanfang data and VIP database were searched for prospective randomized controlled trial of cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in incidence of secondary surgical procedures.Data were collected and extracted by two reviewers independently.Risk of bias was assessed using the criteria of Cochrane Reviews Handbook 5.1.0.Review Manager 5.2 software system was used to evaluate the data for Meta analysis.Results A total of 12 trials were included.Six of them were short-term follow up (two years).The 6 other trials were mid-and long-term follow up (mean 5.8 years).There are 4 trials with low risk of bias, 7 trials with moderate risk of bias, and 1 trial with high risk of bias.The results of meta-analysis showed there was no statistical difference in reoperation rate of adjacent level between the two groups at two years follow-up;however, the reoperation rate of non-fusion group was significantly lower in the non-fusion group compared with fusion group at mid-and long-term follow-up.The incidence of secondary surgical procedures at index level was higher in fusion group than in non-fusion group.No statistical difference was found between the two groups in using ‘ removal’ for secondary surgical procedure at two years follow-up;however, the rate of non-fusion group was significantly lower than fusion group at mid-and long-term follow-up.Conclusion Cervical disc arthroplasty was partly superior to anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in avoiding secondary surgical procedures of adjacent levels.However, non-fusion surgery doesn't have any advantages in short time (two years) follow up.Reducing the incidence of pseudarthrosis was an effective way to decrease the incidence of secondary surgery procedures in index level.
