Reversed less invasive stabilization system versus intramedullary fixation devices for femoral trochanteric fractures
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2015.01.006
- VernacularTitle:倒置微创锁定接骨板与髓内钉治疗股骨转子部骨折疗效对比分析
- Author:
Fang ZHOU
;
Lei TAN
;
Zhishan ZHANG
;
Yun TIAN
;
Hongquan JI
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Femoral fractures;
Internal fixators;
Fracture fixation,intramedullary
- From:
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
2015;35(1):32-39
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the efficacy of reversed less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and intramedullary fixation devices for treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures.Methods Data of 362 consecutive patients with femoral trochanteric fractures who were treated with reversed LISS or intramedullary fixation devices at our institution between March 2004 and May 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 32 males and 38 females treated with reversed LISS.The mean age at injury was 73.4 years.There were 125 males and 167 females treated with intramedullary fixation.The mean age at injury was 74.7 years.The operation time,intraoperation blood loss and length of hospitalization were compared.The patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire of Harris hip score,and radiographs were used to evaluate the bone healing situation.Results The mean operation time was 120 min in reversed LISS group and 80 min in intramedullary group.The length of hospitalization was 12 days in reversed LISS group and 10 days in intramedullary group.More operation time and longer length of hospitalization were needed in reversed LISS group.The intraoperation blood loss was 100 ml in reversed LISS group and 100 ml in intramedullary group.There were 3 DVT in reversed LISS group,10 DVT and 3 PE in intramedullary group.No difference was found in the aspect of intraoperation blood loss,postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rate.A total of 320 patients were successfully followed-up,including 63 in LISS group and 257 in intramedullary group.The median Harris score was 75 in LISS group and 77 in intramedullary fixation group respectively.There was no difference of hip function score between two groups.The implant-related complication rate was 11.1％ in reversed LISS group,including 7 implant breakages.In intramedullary fixation group,there were neck screw exiting in 2 patients and cutout in 9 patients.So the implant-related complication rate was 4.3％ in intramedullary fixation group,which is statistically lower.Conclusion Both reversed LISS and intramedullary are effective for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.There were no major difference in functional outcome between LISS and intramedullary nail.Intramedullary nail is still the choice of priority in most unstable proximal femoral fractures.The implants related complications in reversed LISS group are higher than Intramedullary nail group.However,for the unstable fractures proximal femoral fractures with lateral wall fracture,in which nailing may be difficult,reversely using LISS may be a good alternative.
