Application of lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in treatment of patients with communicating hydrocephalus :a Meta analysis
10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2017.33.027
- VernacularTitle:运用腰池-腹腔分流术与脑室-腹腔分流术治疗交通性脑积液患者的Meta分析
- Author:
Dong LYU
1
;
Dong ZHONG
;
Fuan ZHANG
;
Jiong LI
;
Haoyang HUANG
;
Wei DU
;
Haijian XIA
Author Information
1. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院神经外科 400016
- Keywords:
communicating hydrocephalus;
lumboperitoneal shunt;
ventriculoperi-toneal shunt;
Meta-analysis
- From:
Chongqing Medicine
2017;46(33):4686-4689
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To investigate the effect of lumboperitoneal (L-P) shunt and ventriculoperitoneal(V-P) shunt for trea-ting the patients with communicating hydrocephalus .Methods The databases of PubMed ,Web of Science ,Scopuss ,Karge , EBSCO+MEDLINE ,OVID ,EMBASE ,CNKI ,CBM disc databases ,Wanfang databases ,Weipu databases were retrieved by com-puter .The relevant literatures about L-P shunt and V-P shunt for treating communicating hydrocephalus included in these databases during 1990-2016 were collected and performed the meta analysis by using the STATA 12 .0 software .Results The success rate of L-P shunt in treating communicating hydrocephalus was apparently higher than that of V-P shunt(P<0 .05) .Moreover ,postopera-tive infection rate ,obstruction rate of shunt system and total postoperative complications rate in L-P shunt were apparently lower than those of V-P shunt(P<0 .05) ,However ,there was no statistical difference in shunt poor rate between L-P shunt and V-P shunt(P>0 .05) .Conclusion L-P shunt is worth recommending .But due to lower quality of the evidences ,it is needed more high quality primary studies to remedy the insufficiency of the study .
