The role of abatacept in the treatment of type 2 diabetic nephropathy in rats
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1000-6699.2017.12.009
- VernacularTitle:阿巴西普对大鼠2型糖尿病肾病的治疗作用
- Author:
Yan JIAO
1
;
Xiuyun LI
;
Xujuan SHUI
;
Kaineng WEI
;
Chao ZHENG
;
Yaping ZHAO
;
Chunpeng ZOU
Author Information
1. 325000,温州市人民医院妇产超声科
- Keywords:
Abatacept;
Diabetic nephropathy;
Glomerulus;
Haemodynamics;
Elasticity
- From:
Chinese Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
2017;33(12):1050-1056
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To observe the role of abatacept in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy in rats. Methods Type 2 diabetic nephropathy rat model was established, and was randomly divided into abatacept group and non-intervention group, 15 each. 15 normal rats were served as control group ( NC) . The abatacept group was given abatacept for 8 weeks. The control group was set at the same time period. Then the blood biochemical indexes, blood flow parameters of renal main artery, elasticity of renal parenchymal, HE staining of renal parenchymal and ultrastructure of podocytes were all evaluated. The expression of CD31, CD34, podocin, nephrin, and B7-1 in renal parenchyma were detected. Results Compared to the NC group, the fasting blood glucose, creatinine clearance rate, urine albumin excretion rate, and kidney hypertrophy index in the non-intervention and abatacept groups were significantly increased (P<0. 05);creatinine clearance rate, urine albumin excretion rate, and kidney hypertrophy index in the abatacept group were significantly lower compared to the non-intervention group (P<0. 05). There were significant differences in peak systolic velocity, end diastolic velocity, and mean velocity among these 3 groups, and these differences were ranked as non-intervention groupabatacept>control groups (P<0. 05). There were significant differences in the stiffness of kidneys among these three groups, with the differences ranked as non-intervention>abatacept>control groups (P<0. 05). HE staining and transmission electron microscope observation showed that there were obvious changes in the renal parenchyma of rats in the non-intervention group and the abatacept group, and the changes of kidney in the non-intervention group were worse than those in the abatacept group. CD31 and CD34 expression in kidney parenchyma of rats in the abatacept group and non-intervention group were higher than those in the control group, the abatacept group and non-intervention group>the control group (P<0. 05), while no significant differences between the abatacept group and non-intervention group in CD31 and CD34 expression (P>0. 05). There were significant differences in podocin and nephrin expression in kidney parenchyma of rats among these three groups, and these differences were ranked as the control>abatacept>non-intervention groups (P<0. 05). There were significant differences in B7-1 expression in kidney parenchyma of rats among these three groups, and these differences were ranked as the control
