Preventive Effects of Multi-Lamellar Emulsion on Low Potency Topical Steroid Induced Local Adverse Effect.
- Author:
Geun Dong SUL
1
;
Hyun Jung PARK
;
Jong Hwan BAE
;
Keum Duck HONG
;
Byeong Deog PARK
;
Jaesun CHUN
;
Se Kyoo JEONG
;
Seung Hun LEE
;
Sung Ku AHN
;
Hyun Jung KIM
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Epidermal permeability barrier function; Multilamellar emulsion; Skin permeation; Topical glucocorticoids
- MeSH: Desonide; Diffusion; Epidermis; Glucocorticoids; Inflammation; Permeability; Retention (Psychology); Skin; Steroids
- From:Annals of Dermatology 2013;25(1):5-11
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: BACKGROUND: Topical steroid treatment induces diverse local Wand systemic adverse effects. Several approaches have been tried to reduce the steroid-induced adverse effects. Simultaneous application of physiological lipid mixture is also suggested. OBJECTIVE: Novel vehicles for topical glucocorticoids formulation were evaluated for the efficacy of reducing side-effects and the drug delivery properties of desonide, a low potency topical steroid. METHODS: Transcutaneous permeation and skin residual amount of desonide were measured using Franz diffusion cells. The in vivo anti-inflammatory activity was evaluated using murine model. RESULTS: Topical steroids formulation containing desonide, in either cream or lotion form, were prepared using multi-lamellar emulsion (MLE), and conventional desonide formulations were employed for comparison. MLE formulations did not affect the anti-inflammatory activity of the desonide in phobol ester-induced skin inflammation model, compared with conventional formulations. While the penetrated amounts of desonide were similar for all the tested formulations at 24 hours after application, the increased lag time was observed for the MLE formulations. Interestingly, residual amount of desonide in epidermis was significantly higher in lotion type MLE formulation. Steroid-induced adverse effects, including permeability barrier function impairment, were partially prevented by MLE formulation. CONCLUSION: Topical desonide formulation using MLE as a vehicle showed a better drug delivery with increased epidermal retention. MLE also partially prevented the steroid-induced side effects, such as skin barrier impairment.
