Clinical analysis of 76 cases of sentinel lymph node detection in cervical cancer and endometrial cancer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-567x.2017.09.006
- VernacularTitle:子宫恶性肿瘤前哨淋巴结检测76例临床分析
- Author:
Sichen LIANG
1
;
Zhiqi WANG
;
Jianliu WANG
Author Information
1. 100044,北京大学人民医院妇产科
- Keywords:
Uterine cervical neoplasms;
Endometrial neoplasms;
Sentinel lymph node biopsy
- From:
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
2017;52(9):605-611
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the feasibility and clinical value of identifying sentinel lymph node (SLN) and to assess possible factors associated with detection rate in both cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. Methods Retrospective study of 76 cases (39 with cervical cancer and 37 with endometrial cancer) were conducted in Peking University People′s Hospital. All patients underwent SLN biopsy with tracers of indocyanine green (ICG) and (or) carbon nanoparticles. All mapped SLN was resected and followed by procedures that systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy and hysterectomy according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. All the lymph nodes were examined postoperatively for the routine paraffin section of hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. Detection rate, sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLN were calculated and factors associated with the detection rate were analyzed. Results The overall detection rate was 95%(72/76), with 74%(56/76) positive bilaterally. The bilateral detection rate of SLN with combined technique was significantly higher than that with single technique (P<0.05). The difference of SLN detection rate between cervical and endometrial cancer patients were not significant (P>0.05). SLN were mostly recognized in obturator (32.1%, 114/355) and external iliac areas (32.4%, 115/355) in cervical cancer, and in external iliac (41.2%, 91/221) and obturator areas (39.4%, 87/221) in endometrial cancer. Among 55 patients underwent systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy, the sensitivity of SLN detection was 75% and the negative predictive value was 96%. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were both 100% in patients with successfully bilateral mapped of SLN. Conclusions The overall detection rate of SLN in cervical and endometrial cancer is the highest with the combined technique of ICG and carbon nanoparticles. The detection rate and located regions of SLN are similar between cervical and endometrial cancer,and SLN are mostly recognized in the external iliac and obturator areas. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of SLN detection are high, especially when SLN are bilateral mapped.
