Long-term Prognosis of Revascularization in Patients With Ostial/shaft Lesions of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery (ULMCA)
10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2017.09.009
- VernacularTitle:无保护左主干开口/体部病变患者血运重建术的长期预后
- Author:
peng Xian YU
1
;
zheng Shu LV
;
Fei YUAN
;
ling Xiao ZHANG
;
chun Yue GAO
;
qiang Ji HE
;
Yu LI
;
jun Xue REN
Author Information
1. 首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心内科
- Keywords:
Coronary artery disease;
Angiopiasty,transluminal,percutaneous coronary;
Coronary artery bypass grafting;
Prognosis
- From:
Chinese Circulation Journal
2017;32(9):869-873
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective:To compare the long-term prognosis of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ostial/shaft lesions of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA).Methods:A total of 259 patients with isolated ostial/midshaft lesions of ULMCA who received PCI or CABG in our hospital from 2003-01 to 2009-07 were enrolled.The patients were divided into 2 groups:PCI group,n=149 patients who received drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation and CABG group,n=110.The end points were all cause death,myocardial infarction (MI) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) which included cardiac death,non-fetal MI,stroke,repeated revascularization and the composite events death.Results:The median follow-up period was 7.1 years (inter quartile range 5.3-8.2 years) in all patients.Before multivariate adjusting,the following parameters were similar between PCI group and CABG group:all cause death (12.7％ vs 29.7％),P=-0.096;non-fatal MI (14.8％ vs 8.5％),P=0.844;stroke (9.3％ vs 6.3％),P=0.904;repeated revascularization (26.8％ vs 19.0％),P=0.234;composite events of cardiac death/stroke/MI (18.9％ vs 20.3％),P=0.224 and MACCE occurrence (37.5％ vs 34.2％),P=0.946.With adjusted variations,the trend was similar to pre-adjustment.Conclusion:During the maximum 8.2 years follow-up period,PCI and CABG had the similar efficacy and safety in patients with ostial/shaft lesions of ULMCA.
