The influence of mobile management software education to the young and middle-aged type 2 diabetes patients′knowledge and behavior
10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2017.26.004
- VernacularTitle:糖尿病移动管理教育软件对中青年2型糖尿病患者知信行的影响
- Author:
Xiaofang CHU
1
;
Lin LIN
;
Lijie LI
;
Yuting CAO
;
Huan WANG
Author Information
1. 116033,辽宁省大连市中心医院内分泌科
- Keywords:
Diabetes mellitus;
Mobile management software;
Middle- aged and young;
Knowledge and behavior
- From:
Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
2017;33(26):2016-2020
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To study the influence of mobile management software education to the young and middle-aged type 2 diabetes patients′ knowledge and behavior. Methods 130 cases of diabetes patients was selected in 2015.10 to 2016.04 which came from the endocrine ward of the center hospital of Dalian ,68 males and 62 females.63 cases were divided into experimental group and 67 cases in control group, according to the random number table method. The control group was given the regular out-of- hospital management mode, and the experimental group was managed by the diabetes mobile management software. Six months after the intervention, the effects of two groups on blood glucose, metabolic index, diabetes knowledge, self-management efficacy and self-management behavior were observed. Results There was no significant difference in fasting blood glucose, postprandial 2 h bloodglucose and glycosylated hemoglobin between the two groups before the intervention (P > 0.05).After intervention for three months, the date in control group respectively (8.81 ± 2.02) mmol/L, (12.44 ± 2.53) mmol/L, (8.41±1.40)%. experimental group respectively (7.91±2.29) mmol/L, (10.65±2.87) mmol/L, (7.83± 1.25)%. The difference was statistically significant (t=2.320, 3.691, 2.416, P < 0.05 or 0.01). After intervention for six months, these numbers in control group were (7.96±1.79)mmol/L,(10.61±2.12) mmol/L,(7.85±1.24)%. The experimental group were (7.00±2.00) mmol/L, (8.93±2.16) mmol/L, (7.20±1.25)%. The difference was statistically significant(t=2.805, 4.368, 2.914, P < 0.01).Compared the related knowledge scores (Good, general, poor) before intervention ,the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).After 3 months of intervention, the cases in control group was 5, 57 ,1 respectively, the experimental group were 15,46,0 respectively. After 6 months intervention, the control group was 40, 32, 0. The experimental group were 48, 14, 0. After 3 months and 6 months intervention. There was significant difference between the two groups, (Z=2.637, 2.055, P<0.01 or 0.05). scores of diabetes mellitus (high level, medium level, low level)in the two groups was no significant difference (P > 0.05), before the intervention. After 3 months intervention ,cases in control group were 49,131respectively, the experimental group were 54,5,0 , after 6 months intervention ,control group were 59,4,0 ,respectively , the experimental group were 61,0,0. After 3 months and 6 months intervention, there was significant difference between the two groups (Z=2.103, 1.992,P<0.05). Diabetes self- management effectiveness score(good, moderate, poor) was compared in two groups. There was no significant difference between the two groups before and after 3 months intervention (P>0.05). After 6 months of intervention, cases in the control group was 9,54,0,respectively, the experimental group were 43, 18, 0, the difference was statistically significant (Z = 6.315, P < 0.01). Conclusions The education model of diabetes mobile management software can help to improve the standard rate of glucose and other metabolic indexes, at the same time also improve the level of knowledge and behavior of middle-aged and young patients with type 2 diabetes, but it′s long-term effect needs further study.