Analysis of curative effect of high frequent oscillation ventilation combined with inhaled nitric oxide for neonatal hypoxic respiratory failure
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.18.011
- VernacularTitle:高频振荡通气联合吸入一氧化氮治疗新生儿低氧性呼吸衰竭疗效分析
- Author:
Zaili FENG
1
;
Zhaoqing YIN
;
Xueyan LI
;
Mingyan WANG
;
Hong NI
;
Yazhou SUN
;
Jiaqin WANG
Author Information
1. 德宏州人民医院儿科
- Keywords:
Inhaled nitric oxide;
High frequent oscillation ventilation;
Respiratory failure;
Infant,newborn
- From:
Chinese Journal of Applied Clinical Pediatrics
2017;32(18):1402-1405
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective To compare the curative effect with high frequent oscillation ventilation (HFOV) and with HFOV + inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in the treatment of neonatal hypoxic respiratory failure (NRHF).Methods Data of 60 NHRF patients in the People's Hospital of Dehong Prefecture from January 2015 to December 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.The patients were divided into HFOV group (32 cases) and HFOV + iNO group (28 cases) according to the treatment methods.The comparison between the 2 groups was established as following:oxygenation index(OI),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide [Pa (CO2)] and complications.Results There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in time of birth,gestational age,birth weight,gender ratio and original diseases (all P ＞ 0.05).As for OI there was no significant difference at 0 h between the 2 groups (27.8 ± 3.5 vs.27.6 ± 3.7) (t =0.04,P ＞ 0.05);OI of HFOV + iNO group (11.2 ± 3.4,7.3 ± 3.0,7.0 ± 2.6,respectively) was more significantly decreased than that in the HFOV group (14.5 ± 3.3,9.6 ± 3.0,8.5 ± 2.8,respectively) at 8 h,16 h,24 h,and there were significant differences between the 2 groups (t =3.81,5.16,2.14,all P ＜ 0.05).As for P a (CO2) there was no significant difference at 0 h [(65.14 ± 14.97) mmHg vs.(64.79 ± 13.40) mmHg] (t =0.095,P ＞ 0.05);the changes in Pa (CO2) had no statistically significance difference between HFOV + iNO group and HFOV group at 8 h,16 h,24 h [8 h:(50.71 ± 10.49) mmHg vs.(49.02 ± 11.74) mmHg,16 h:(40.99 ± 12.38) mmHg vs.(40.02 ± 12.04) mmHg,and 24 h:(39.01 ±9.80) mmHg vs.(38.00 ±7.85) mmHg,all P ＞0.05].As for the complications,there was no difference between the 2 groups in pulmonary air leak,pneumorrhagia,intracranial hemorrhage,blood platelet ＜100 × 109/L,methemoglobin concentration ＞ 3％,or dysfunction of blood coagulation (all P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Both HFOV and HFOV + iNO methods are effective for NRHF.Treatment with HFOV + iNO method is more effective.Treatment for NHRF with HFOV + iNO is safe,effective,without complication increase in a short term.
