Cephalometric difference according to the differential treatment methods in Class III malocclusion.
- Author:
Hyoung Seon BAIK
1
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontic, Yonsei University, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cephalometric Difference;
Class III malocclusion;
4-treatment method in Class III
- MeSH:
Compensation and Redress;
Diagnosis;
Humans;
Jaw;
Male;
Malocclusion*;
Masks;
Orthopedics
- From:Korean Journal of Orthodontics
1997;27(2):197-208
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Class III malocclusion patients can be approached with many different types of treatment methods, and thus, each patient's problems must be accurately evaluated to allow selection of the best possible treatment method. Cephalometric analysis is an essential part of diagnosis and treatment planning of orthodontic patients, and it would certainly be helpful if reliable cephalometric guidelines could be set. The author divided 482 Class III malocclusion patients(253 males and 229 females) into fourgroups according to different types of treatment methods they have received to correct imbalance between upper and lower jaws: 1) orthopedic appliance (face mask & RPE), 2) camouflage treatment with fixed appliance, 3) surgical-orthodontic treatment, 4) cross-bite correction with removable plates/ functional appliance. Cephalometric values at the time of first clinical examination were compare among the four groups. Cephalometric analysis indicates the following results: 1)the amounts of antero-posterior and vertical skeletal discrepancies and dental compensation were greatest in surgery group 2) SNB, Wits, distance from Nasion Perpendicular Plane to point a facial angle, facial convexity, and APDI were greater in orthopedic appliance group than fixed appliance(camouflage) group, but there was no statistical difference 3) removable plates/ functional appliance group showed least amounts of skeletal discrepancies and dental compensation with statistical significance.
