The Effect of Rhythmic Neurodynamic on the Upper Extremity Nerve Conduction Velocity and the Function for Stroke Patients.
10.18857/jkpt.2017.29.4.169
- Author:
Jeong Il KANG
1
;
Young Jun MOON
;
Dae Keun JEONG
;
Hyun CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Physical Therapy, Sehan University, Yeongam, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Never conduction velocity;
Nerve viscoelastic effect;
Rhythmic neurodynamic;
Stroke
- MeSH:
Axilla;
Elbow;
Hemiplegia;
Humans;
Mechanoreceptors;
Median Nerve;
Neural Conduction*;
Radial Nerve;
Stroke*;
Ulnar Nerve;
Upper Extremity*;
Wrist
- From:
Journal of Korean Physical Therapy
2017;29(4):169-174
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to resolve, in an efficient manner, the mechanoreceptor problems of the part far from the paretic upper extremity in stroke patients, as well as to provide clinical basic data of an intervention program for efficient neurodynamic in stroke patients, by developing a rhythmic neurodynamic exercise program and verifying functional changes depending on the increase in the upper extremity nerve conduction velocity. METHODS: Samples were extracted from 18 patients with hemiplegia, caused by stroke, and were randomly assigned to either the experimental group I for the general upper extremity neurodynamic (n=9) and the experimental group II for rhythmic upper extremity neurodynamic (n=9). An intervention program was applied ten times per set (three sets one time) and four times a week for two weeks (once a day). As a pre-test, changes in the upper extremity nerve conduction velocity and functions were assessed, and two weeks later, a posttest was conducted to re-measure them in the same manner. RESULTS: The wrist and palm sections of the radial nerve and the wrist and elbow sections of the median nerve, as well as the wrist, lower elbow, upper elbow, and axilla sections of the ulnar nerve had significant differences with respect to the upper extremity nerve conduction velocity between the two groups (p<0.05)(p<0.01), and significant differences were also found in the upper extremity functions (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Rhythmic neurodynamic accelerated the nerve conduction velocity more in broader neural sections than the general neurodynamic. In conclusion, rhythmic neurodynamic was proven to be effective for improving the functions of upper extremity.
