Enhancement of Vasculogenesis and Osteogenesis Using Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor in the Rat Model of Tibial Distraction Osteogenesis.
10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.5.357
- Author:
Sung Jin SHIN
1
;
Dong Yeon LEE
;
Hye Ran LEE
;
Jung Il KIM
;
Won Joon YOO
;
Tae Joon CHO
;
In Ho CHOI
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. leedy@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
endothelial progenitor cell;
granulocyte-colony stimulating factor;
distraction osteogenesis
- MeSH:
Animals;
Blood Vessels;
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor;
Osteogenesis;
Osteogenesis, Distraction;
Perfusion Imaging;
Rats;
Stem Cells
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2011;46(5):357-363
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Proper speed of distraction is critical for successful new bone formation in distraction osteogenesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on formation of new blood vessels and new bones in the rat model of tibial distraction osteogenesis (DO) to develop enhancement method of bone formation while increasing the distraction speed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty two rat-tibial DO models were included in this study, and were divided into 3 groups; group I (rapid distraction), group II (rapid distraction with G-CSF), and group III (slow distraction). The amount of bone formation and relative blood flow were analyzed by sequential radiographs and laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI). Blood sampling was done before G-CSF injection, at 2 weeks and 5 weeks after G-CSF injection and surface expression such as Scal-1+ and C-kit+ of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) was analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) for the effects of G-CSF in inducing mobilization of EPCs. RESULTS: The amount of new bone formation in the distraction gap on serial radiographs was higher during the consolidation period in groups II and III than in group I but, the difference was not significant (p>0.05). The relative blood flow in the distraction gap in groups II and III increased more significantly than in group I (p<0.05). FACS analysis showed an increased EPCs fraction after G-CSF injection. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that G-CSF administration ameliorated bone formation and blood flow during rapid distraction in the rat model of tibial distraction osteogenesis. We think that G-CSF has an effect on mobilization of EPCs resulting in an increase in the blood flow.
