A Comparative Study of Three Different Fixation Techniques for Displaced Two- and Three-Part Proximal Humeral Fractures.
10.4055/jkoa.2011.46.5.372
- Author:
Sang Jin CHEON
1
;
Ji Min LEE
;
Jung Sub LEE
;
Hui Taek KIM
;
Jeung Tak SUH
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea. scheon@pusan.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Comparative Study ; Original Article
- Keywords:
proximal humerus;
two- and three-part fractures;
closed reduction and percutaneous pinning;
bifurcated plate and tension band wiring;
locking compression plate
- MeSH:
Cohort Studies;
Humans;
Humerus;
Neck;
Shoulder Fractures
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2011;46(5):372-379
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the results of three different surgical methods - closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (Group I), bifurcated plate and tension band wiring (Group II), locking compression plate (Group III), - for displaced two- and three-part proximal humeral fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients were treated with a closed reduction and percutaneous pinning, 19 with bifurcated plate and tension band wiring and 18 with locking compression plate. All patients were followed up for more than 1 year, and were reviewed and evaluated with respect to radiological and clinical results. The radiological results were evaluated by bony union and humerus neck shaft angle using the Paavolainen method. The clinical results were evaluated by Neer's evaluation criteria. RESULTS: Bony union rate, time period to achieve bony union, neck shaft angle and clinical results in Groups II and III were better than those in Group I (p<0.05). There were no significant differences between Groups II and III. We observed trends for worse clinical outcomes in patients older than 65 years compared with those in patients younger than 65 years. Clinical outcome for patients older than 65 years in Group III (average 87.5 points) was better than that for the same age group in Groups I (average 77.2 points) and II (average 79.3 points), but the cohorts were too small to obtain statistical significance. Complication rate in Groups II, III was lower than that in Group I (p=0.005). CONCLUSION: The radiological and clinical results in Groups II and III were significantly better than those in Group I, and there were no significant differences between Groups II and III. We thought that bifurcated plate and tension band wiring and locking compression plate were useful surgical methods for displaced two- and three-part proximal humeral fractures.
