Morphological Study of the Nerve Regeneration in Relation to the Laryngeal Functional Recovery after Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury in Rat.
- Author:
Sook SUNWOO
1
;
Sung Min CHUNG
;
Hwa Young LEE
;
Soo Yeon PARK
;
Hoo Jae HANN
Author Information
1. Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans' University, Korea. ahnhan@ewha.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Rat;
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve;
Transection Injury;
Laryngeal Function;
Nerve regeneration
- MeSH:
Animals;
Axons;
Collagen;
Macrophages;
Nerve Regeneration*;
Rats;
Rats, Sprague-Dawley;
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries*;
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve*;
Synkinesis
- From:Korean Journal of Anatomy
2003;36(6):549-558
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Recovery from the laryngeal dysfunction caused by the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is not common. Recently, we have found that PEMS treatment improved the functional recovery rate and shortened the recovery time after RLN transection and reanastomosis in rat. In this study, we compared the morphology of RLN stumps according to their laryngeal functional status to investigate 1) the nerve morphology associated with functional recovery and 2) the possible underlying mechanism of persistent laryngeal dysfunction after RLN injury. We transected left RLN and then performed primary neurorrhaphy in Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 36). They were randomly divided into PEMS and control groups. 19 animals (10 PEMS group, 7 control group and 2 normal control animals) survived until the end of the experiment were included in the morphological analysis. Both the proximal and distal segments of reanastomosed RLN were obtained and the ultrastructural study was done using transmission electron microscope. There is no prominent morphological difference between the PEMS and control groups. In the functional recovery group, the findings suggestive of nerve regeneration were prominent both in the proximal and distal segments. Many regenerating axons were also observed in the proximal segments of RLNs in non-recovery group. But findings such as degenerating axons, infiltration of macrophage and inflammatory cells, increased collagen fibrils were frequently observed in this group. Even in the distal segments of functional non-recovery group, prominent regenerative findings were observed in 9 out of 10 (4 out of 5 PEMS and all control group animals) samples. We could not find any regenerating findings in one case of the PEMS group. Through the above results, failure of the nerve regeneration is unlikely the main cause of functional non-recovery after RLN injury in rat. Possible other causes such as synkinesis or definite but inadequate nerve regeneration should be considered and needs further investigation.
