Analysis of Repeat Surgery in the Low Back Disorders.
- Author:
Kyung Jin SONG
;
Hyung Joo PARK
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Low back disorder;
Repeat surgery;
Analysis
- MeSH:
Constriction, Pathologic;
Decompression;
Diagnostic Tests, Routine;
Discitis;
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome;
Humans;
Intervertebral Disc Displacement;
Medical Records;
Neurologic Manifestations;
Osteomyelitis;
Radiculopathy;
Reoperation*;
Retrospective Studies;
Risk Factors;
Spinal Stenosis;
Spine;
Spondylosis;
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1998;33(4):1126-1133
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
We designed this study to analyze the causes of repeat surgery in the low back disorder after primary procedure, to evaluate the risk factors and to suggest the rational approachs can prevent and solve the problems related with repeat surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the medical record and radiographs of 24 patients who had sustained persistent or recurrent pain, failed to extended conservative therapy, showing abnormal myelogram and/or CT scan with nerve root compression, and with segmental instability consistent with patients symptom and sign after the primary procedures. We evaluated the functional outcome according to Kims(1986) criteria. The causes of remained or recurrent pain with neurologic symptom were persistent or aggravated lumbar spinal stenosis in 10 cases(42%), recurrent disc herniation in 4 cases(17%), infection in 3 cases(12%), instability in 2 cases(8%) and others in 5 cases(20%). Satisfactory outcome was recorded in 79%(19/24) of patients. The characteristics of the patients associated with satisfactory outcome were those who operated by recurrent disc herniation, instability, retained disc, metal malposition, and nerve root compression by bone chip. But the characteristics of the patients associated with unsatisfactory outcome were those who operated by infection, lumbar spinal stenosis aggravated by degenerative spondylosis and multiple herniated disc, inadequate decompression of lateral and/or foraminal stenosis in aged patients. The most common lesion site was on L4-5 disc, and unsatisfactory result was expected at the upper lumbar spine involvement. Favorable outcome could be expected in the presence of a pain-free interval more than 1 year from the date of the previous operation or persistent symptoms immediately after the initial operaion. We were expected the risk factors leading to repeat surgery were old aged(more than 60) patients, upper lumbar spine involvement and multiple lumbar disc herniation. Postoperative diskitis or osteomyelitis, pain free interval more than 1 month or less than 1 year, and those who had a revision on the lumbar spine previously could be considered as a poor prognostic indicators. When surgery is indicated for degenerative lumbar spinal disorders, adequate diagnostic tests and the execution of appropriate procedures based upon this information should be carried out to prevent the repeat surgery in the low back disorders. Adequate postoperative management can reduce the occurrence of failed back surgery syndrome and in cases necessitating repeat surgery, thorough analysis of causes following proper surgical stabilization can reduce the operative morbidity with early return to daily life.
