Development and Evaluation of Alternative Nutrition Signposting Concepts.
- Author:
Se Young OH
1
;
Woo Kyung KIM
;
Hye Jin AHN
;
Ji Won LEE
;
Hye Kyung PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Food and Nutrition, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 130-701, Korea. seyoung@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
nutrition labeling;
multiple traffic light;
understanding;
time to interpret
- MeSH:
Adoption;
Eating;
Food Labeling;
Food Packaging;
Light;
Multivariate Analysis;
Sodium
- From:The Korean Journal of Nutrition
2008;41(8):851-859
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
To promote the adoption of healthier eating patterns, this study was aimed to develop and evaluate alternative front of pack nutrition signposting concepts. Based on previous research, we developed two signposting concepts, Multiple Traffic Light (MTL) and Multiple Traffic Light with % Daily Value (MTL-%DV). The signposts featured three key nutrients, total sugar, saturated fat, and sodium. Actual food packaging with no front of pack signposting (NoSP) was included in the evaluation to act as a benchmark against which to compare the performance of the different signposting options. Using an interviewer administered method, we assessed the degree of understanding and time to interpret on a total of 534 subjects (194 elementary, 108 middle, and 103 high schoolers, 128 adults). In the individual product evaluations, MTL (87.0%) obtained the highest level of correct responses, followed by MTL-%DV (83.1%) and NoSP (52.2%). Except for signposting concepts, age, gender and living area were not associated with the degree of correct responses in multivariate analyses. When used to compare products with different colors of nutrient contents, correct responses were more than 90% for MTL-%DV (91.5%) and MTL (90.3%). The middle and high schoolers revealed the lower likelihood of correct response compared to the other two groups. In case of comparing products with same colors of nutrient contents, the proportion of correct responses was the highest in NoSP (90%), followed by MTL%DV (77.4%) and MTL (48.5%). In terms of time to interpret, MTL-%DV and MTL performed better than NoSP in the individual product evaluation and the comparison of two products with different colors of nutrient contents. NoSP performed the best in the comparison of two products with same colors of nutrient contents. A majority of the participants preferred MTL-%DV (78%) most and thought it the most useful in helping them make healthier food choices. Based on these findings, MTL-%DV was considered to most closely meet the objectives of the initiatives.
