Results of Epitympanoplasty with Mastoid Obliteration Technique.
- Author:
Myung Koo KANG
1
;
Chi Sung HAN
;
Bu Min KIM
;
Sung Hyun BOO
;
Heon Soo PARK
;
Jun HUR
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Dong-A university, Pusan, Korea. moon6p@netian.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Cholesteatoma;
Epitympanoplasty;
Mastoid Obliteration
- MeSH:
Adhesives;
Adult;
Cholesteatoma;
Ear, Middle;
Follow-Up Studies;
Hot Temperature;
Humans;
Mastoid*;
Otitis Media;
Recurrence
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2001;44(5):476-484
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There have been heated controversies over the choice of the canal wall down mastoidectomy (CWD) and canal wall up mastoidectomy (CWU), which are operational methods used to eliminate the lesion of chronic otitis media including cholesteatoma. The CWD method can secure a good operation field and remove the lesion easily, but it accompanies a cavity problem. The CWU method also has its shortcomings as it is difficult to eliminate cholesteatoma completely using this method. Combining the advantages of both methods, we invented a new operational method. The present study assesses the results of its use after a follow up of 55 months. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December of 1994 to March of 1997, epitympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration was conducted on 44 adults (42 patients). Of these, 38 cases were cholesteatomas, 2 cases adhesive otitis media and 4 cases chronic otitis media with poor E-tube function. The postoperative observation period ranged from 41 to 68 months, with the average period of 55.2 months. RESULTS: There were 3 cases of residual cholesteatoma in the mastoid cavity and 3 cases in the middle ear cavity. All residual cholesteatomas in the mastoid cavity were treated with CWU, and there was no recurrent cholesteatoma or otorrhea, nor retraction pocket. CONCLUSION: Although the observation period of the postoperative process was not long enough, there was no recurrence. We suggest that it is advantageous to operate on cholesteatoma using the new method.
