Treatment of Unstable Intra-articular Fracture of Distal Radius: Comparison of Closed Reduction and External Fixation versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.
- Author:
Eun Sun MOON
;
Keun Bae LEE
;
Seung Young CHEON
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Unstable intra-articular fracture;
Closed reduction and external fixation;
Open reduction and internal fixation
- MeSH:
Follow-Up Studies;
Humans;
Intra-Articular Fractures*;
Radius*;
Range of Motion, Articular;
Soft Tissue Injuries
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
1999;34(5):781-787
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: To compare the functional and radiographic results of the treatment in unstable intra-articular fractures of distal radius by closed reduction and external fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty cases of unstable intra-articular fractures of distal radius were treated either by application of closed reduction and external fixation (CREF) or by open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between March 1989 and June 1997. They were followed up for more than one year. To assess the functional results, we used Green and O' Brien' s score system and for the radiographic results, measured volar tilt, radial inclination and radial length. RESULT: In functional results, excellent to good results were obtained in 19 cases (76%) in the CREF group and 10 cases (80%) in the ORIF group, and the average score was 81.4 and 82.8 by the Green and O' Brien' s score system. In radiographic results, mean loss of volar tilt, radial inclination and radial length were 1.4 degree (13.4%), 2.0 degree (9.0%), 1.3 mm (10.3%) in the CREF group and 1.2 degree (10.8%), 1.6 degree (6.1%) and 1.2 mm (11.5%) in the ORIF group on last follow-up radiographs. There was no evidence of statistical difference between two groups in functional and radiographic results (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: If an appropriate operative method is selected according to the presence of several properties, including the pattern of fracture, the general condition and activity of patient and the degree of soft tissue injury, the two operative managements are considered useful to restoring articular congruity and alignment and to allow early postoperative range of motion exercise
