Comparison of Speech Audiometry Using KS Word List and Hahm's List in Hearing Impaired Adults.
10.3342/kjorl-hns.2015.58.2.88
- Author:
Sung Hye PARK
1
;
Hyo Jeong LEE
;
Jina KIM
;
Eunoak KIM
;
Jung Hak LEE
;
Hyung Jong KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea. hjk1000@hallym.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Speech audiometry;
Speech discrimination tests;
Speech reception threshold test
- MeSH:
Adult*;
Audiometry;
Audiometry, Speech*;
Compact Disks;
Hearing Loss;
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural;
Hearing*;
Humans;
Speech Discrimination Tests;
Speech Reception Threshold Test;
Voice
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2015;58(2):88-94
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare speech audiometry test results of the conventional Hahm's list with those of Korean standard word lists for adults (KS-WL-A) using both live voice and compact disc (CD) speech presentation modes. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: Eighty patients with sensorineural hearing loss and 23 control subjects with normal hearing participated in the study. Each hearing loss group comprised 20 subjects (mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe hearing loss groups). Speech audiometry was performed to measure the speech recognition threshold (SRT) and word recognition score. KS-WL-A was presented either through a live voice mode or recorded CD materials. Test words from Hahm's list were presented using the live voice mode only. Pure tone audiometry was also conducted for all subjects. RESULTS: Differences between the SRT and pure tone average were within 6 dB in all subgroups in all three stimulation methods, indicating high reliability of the SRT in both the conventional and Korean standard methods. The moderate, moderately severe, and severe hearing loss groups showed lower word recognition scores in the CD mode with KS-WL-A than with the two live voice modes. CONCLUSION: Both the live voice mode and CD mode showed reliable speech audiometry test results in normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Although the CD mode is recommended to standardize test methods and reduce test errors, the live voice mode might be more effective for patients with moderate to severe hearing loss.
