Intraoperative versus Postoperative Measurement in Total Knee Arthroplasty using Computer-Assisted Orthopaedic Surgery (CAOS): Accuracy of CAOS.
10.4055/jkoa.2005.40.2.168
- Author:
Dae Kyung BAE
1
;
Kyoung Ho YOON
;
Sang Jun SONG
;
Seon Goo KIM
;
Kyoung Jun PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea. bdkyung@khmc.or.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Knee;
Arthroplasty;
Computer-assisted navigation system;
Radiographic measurement
- MeSH:
Arthroplasty*;
Axis, Cervical Vertebra;
Knee*
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2005;40(2):168-173
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research was to compare the intra-operative and post-operative measured angle in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to evaluate the postoperative improvement in the mechanical axis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty TKAs were performed using CAOS between February and May 2004. We measured the mechanical axis in the preoperative orthograms. After inserting the implant, we measured the femoral component angle (FCA), tibial component angle (TCA) and tibial component slope (TCS) using the verification tool in CAOS, on the post-operative orthogram and X-ray of the lateral tibial view, 2 observers measured the FCA, TCA, TCS and mechanical axis. RESULTS: The mean FCA, TCA and TCS using the verification tool in CAOS, were valgus 0.03+/-0.85degrees, valgus 0.49+/-1.02degrees, nd 4.26+/-1.64degrees. The mean FCA, TCA and TCS by observer 1 were valgus 0.67+/-1.24degrees, varus 0.54+/-1.54degrees, and 4.57+/-1.74degrees and those by observer 2 were valgus 0.48+/-1.17degrees, varus 0.52+/-1.44degrees, and 4.24+/-2.83degrees. There was a positive correlation between the measured angle by respective observers and the angle measured by the CAOS (p<0.05). The mechanical axis by observers 1 and 2 improved from varus 13.96degrees to valgus 0.04degrees and from varus 14.12degrees to valgus 0.08degrees respectively. CONCLUSION: CAOS affords the possibility of precisely placing the femoral and tibial components. The angles measured by the respective observers and in the CAOS were significantly correlated.
