The Clinical Usefulness of Aerodynamic Test Using the Airway Interruption Method in Patients with Laryngeal Disorders.
- Author:
Young Il MOON
1
;
Yun Young LEE
;
Moon Jung KIM
;
Jae Yeun LEE
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. entd5135@unitel.co.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Aerodynamic test;
Airway interruption method;
Vocal efficiency;
Laryngeal disorders
- MeSH:
Air Pressure;
Glottis;
Humans;
Laryngitis;
Paralysis;
Phonation;
Polyps;
Reference Values
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
1998;41(3):350-359
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The airway interruption method was developed as a combination of the measurement of expiratory pressure, mean air flow, intensity, and frequency. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the airway interruption method in measuring vocal frequency, vocal intensity, mean air flow rate and expiratory air pressure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed phonatory function tests in the patients with vocal nodule (n=380), vocal polyp (n=41), vocal sulcus (n=20), laryngitis (n=72), vocal paralysis (n=10) and glottic cancer, T 1 (n=5). And these results were compared with normal values which were reported previously. In 91 patients with vocal nodule and 5 patients with polyp, phonatory function test was followed up after laryngomicrosurgery and compared with preoperative test. RESULTS: In patients with vocal nodule and polyp, mean air flow rate was significantly increased (p<0.05). In polyp, these differences were greater than nodule group. In vocal paralysis, mean air flow rate was significantly increased than other groups. In glottic cancer (T1), expiratory air pressure was significantly increased than other groups. In laryngitis and sulcus vocalis, mean air flow rate was increased in some phonation methods. But their differences were less significant than other groups. After laryngomicrosurgery, mean air flow rate and expiratory air pressure were decreased in both groups. CONCLUSION: The aerodynamic test using the airway interruption method is a noninvasive, easy to perform and reliable for evaluation of aerodynamic conditions at the glottis. This research finds that the interruption method is effective both in evaluation of the treatment and in postoperative assessments of the laryngeal disorder patients.
