Comparison of Anterior Translation among Three Sternoclavicular Reconstruction Methods in Cadaver Study.
10.4055/jkoa.2017.52.2.178
- Author:
Doo Sup KIM
1
;
Hoe Jeong CHUNG
;
Il Hwan PARK
;
Ji Su SHIN
;
Jun Pyo LEE
;
Young Hwan JANG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea. hjchung29@yonsei.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
kinematics;
biomechanics;
dislocation;
sternoclavicular joint;
cadaver model
- MeSH:
Biomechanical Phenomena;
Cadaver*;
Clavicle;
Dislocations;
Joints;
Methods*;
Shoulder Joint;
Sternoclavicular Joint;
Sternum;
Tendons
- From:The Journal of the Korean Orthopaedic Association
2017;52(2):178-184
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
PURPOSE: Currently, biomechanics and function comparison of the reconstruction of structures play important roles in the sternoclavicular joint stability is not much. In order to confirm the improvement in the functional aspects of the sternoclavicular joint after the three most widely used reconstruction methods, we measured the degree of anterior translation of the sternoclavicular joint after the operation using cadavers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 24 sternoclavicular joints in the cadavers. First, we measured the anterior translation of the clavicle, which was compared with the sternum in 24 normal sternoclavicular joints. We divided the cadaver into three groups and performed each of the three current operations: figure of eight hamastring tendon reconstruction operation (Group 1), subclavius tendon reconstruction operation (Group 2), and hamstring tendon reconstruction operation (Group 3); then we compared the degree of anterior translation in each group. We did the measurement by adding 10 degrees to the glenohumeral joint each time from 0 degrees to 90 degrees. RESULTS: In the normal joint, the clavicle was significantly ascended compared with the sternum. The Group 1 had a 1.68±0.25 mm anterior translation while the Group 2 had 1.81±0.23 mm and Group 3 had 2.8±0.58 mm (Group 1: p=0.004, Group 2: p=0.001, Group 3: p=0.002). The Group 1 showed a low ascending rate of up to 60 degrees, which showed no significant difference with that of the normal joint. However, after 60 degrees, the ascending rate showed a significant increase. In the case of Group 2, there was no significant difference with normal joint of up to 50 degrees. Group 3 showed significant anterior ascending from 20 degree. CONCLUSION: Through measuring the anterior translation of subjects that underwent three representative sternoclavicular joint reconstructions, we found that the result from the Group 1 was most comparable normal translation of the sternoclavicular joint.
