Study about Economic Adequacy of Tonsillectomy and Adenoidectomy Based on Medical Prime Costs.
10.3342/kjorl-hns.2015.58.9.628
- Author:
Hyun Seung CHOI
1
;
Se Won JEONG
;
Chang Yong KIM
;
Jung Hyun CHANG
Author Information
1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea. manbang5@naver.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Adenoidectomy;
Diagnosis-related groups;
Fee for service;
Tonsillectomy
- MeSH:
Adenoidectomy*;
Compensation and Redress;
Diagnosis-Related Groups;
Fee-for-Service Plans;
Fees and Charges;
Hemorrhage;
Humans;
Medical Records;
National Health Programs;
Otolaryngology;
Tonsillectomy*
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
2015;58(9):628-633
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Korean National Health Insurance is based on 'fee for service' system, but recently 7 groups of diseases were forcibly applied to diagnosis related groups (DRG) system. In these 7 group of diseases, tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy were included in the otorhinolaryngology field. The objective of this research is to estimate the invested medical costs, profit and loss, and improvement points for the disease groups according to DRG and 'fee for service' system. SUBJECTS AND METHOD: We investigated 1,377 subjects who underwent tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy based on DRG between January 2011 to December 2013 at our hospital. The profit and loss of medical costs were calculated according to medical record data, medical service fee, and activity based costing (ABC). RESULTS: The total of 1,377 subject comprised of 905 patients younger than 17 years-old and 472 patients older than 18 years-old. A main moderate complication that was not one of the DRG diseases, postoperative bleeding, was only found in 19 patients (1.38%). Profit related to tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy studied for a 3 year-period was higher in the DRG system than in the 'fee for service' system; however, profit was reported as 62.9-67.5% of the actual prime costs. CONCLUSION: DRG system for tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy seems to have higher compensation rate than the 'fee for service' system does. However, the system is still insufficient to compare profit with the input medical cost. Furthermore, the present system of disease grouping needs to be improved to reflect actual medical prime costs.
