Statistical non-parametric mapping in sensor space.
10.1007/s13534-017-0015-6
- Author:
Michael WAGNER
1
;
Reyko TECH
;
Manfred FUCHS
;
Jörn KASTNER
;
Fernando GASCA
Author Information
1. Compumedics Europe GmbH, Heußweg 25, 20255 Hamburg, Germany. mwagner@neuroscan.com
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
EEG;
MEG;
Statistical non-Parametric Mapping;
Topographic Analysis of Variance;
Evoked Response
- MeSH:
Electroencephalography;
Magnetoencephalography;
Methods;
Random Allocation
- From:
Biomedical Engineering Letters
2017;7(3):193-203
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Establishing the significance of observed effects is a preliminary requirement for any meaningful interpretation of clinical and experimental Electroencephalography or Magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. We propose a method to evaluate significance on the level of sensors whilst retaining full temporal or spectral resolution. Input data are multiple realizations of sensor data. In this context, multiple realizations may be the individual epochs obtained in an evoked-response experiment, or group study data, possibly averaged within subject and event type, or spontaneous events such as spikes of different types. In this contribution, we apply Statistical non-Parametric Mapping (SnPM) to MEG sensor data. SnPM is a non-parametric permutation or randomization test that is assumption-free regarding distributional properties of the underlying data. The method, referred to as Maps SnPM, is demonstrated using MEG data from an auditory mismatch negativity paradigm with one frequent and two rare stimuli and validated by comparison with Topographic Analysis of Variance (TANOVA). The result is a time- or frequency-resolved breakdown of sensors that show consistent activity within and/or differ significantly between event or spike types. TANOVA and Maps SnPM were applied to the individual epochs obtained in an evoked-response experiment. The TANOVA analysis established data plausibility and identified latencies-of-interest for further analysis. Maps SnPM, in addition to the above, identified sensors of significantly different activity between stimulus types.
