A cephalometric investigation on the craniofacial configurations of Class II division 1 and 2 in Korean.
- Author:
Jong Won KANG
1
;
Young Jun LEE
;
Young Guk PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University, Korea. ygpark@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Class II division 1 malocclusion;
Class II division 2 malocclusion;
Craniofacial skeletal configurations;
Korean adult
- MeSH:
Adult;
Chin;
Humans;
Incisor;
Malocclusion;
Mandible;
Molar
- From:Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2002;32(3):195-207
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
Numerous studies have revealed the similarities and discrepancies in two divisions of class II malocclusion, since these malocclusion groups have been postulated to be disparate criterion, much as classified under one diagnostic umbrella. This study was undertaken to describe the craniofacial configurations of class II division 1 and 2, and consequently to discriminate the morphologic differences between the two malocclusion groups in Korean sample. Lateral headfilms of 34 class II division 1 and 29 division 2 were employed, while those of 142 adults of normal occlusion served as a control. The landmarks were digitized and 26 variables were statistically analyzed for one way: 1. There manifested no statistically significant difference in maxillary position anteroposteriorly. Normal occlusion group exhibited most anteriorly positioned mandible, whereas class II division 1 showed the most retroposition. Class II division 1 disclosed clockwise rotation tendency of mandible, which resulted in position of the chin posteriorly. 2. Class II division 1 showed greater in SN to MP, SN to PP significantly than other groups. 3. Class II division 2 showed smaller gonial angle and larger mandibular body length than other groups. 4. Class II division 1 revealed greater anterior lower face height than other groups, whereas division 2 dictated significantly greater posterior face height. 5. Class II division 2 expressed the most retroclined lower incisor, while division 1 manifested the most proclination. The largest interincisal angle resided in Class II division 2 group. There were no significant differences in upper molar position anteroposteriorly.
