Comparison between an instructor-led course and training using a voice advisory manikin in initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill acquisition.
- Author:
Mun Ki MIN
1
;
Seok Ran YEOM
;
Ji Ho RYU
;
Yong In KIM
;
Maeng Real PARK
;
Sang Kyoon HAN
;
Seong Hwa LEE
;
Sung Wook PARK
;
Soon Chang PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Teaching materials; Manikins; Education
- MeSH: Adult; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation*; Education; Emergency Medical Technicians; Health Personnel; Heart; Humans; Manikins*; Resuscitation; Teaching Materials; Thorax; Ventilation; Voice*
- From: Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine 2016;3(3):158-164
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We compared training using a voice advisory manikin (VAM) with an instructor-led (IL) course in terms of acquisition of initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) skills, as defined by the 2010 resuscitation guidelines. METHODS: This study was a randomized, controlled, blinded, parallel-group trial. We recruited 82 first-year emergency medical technician students and distributed them randomly into two groups: the IL group (n=41) and the VAM group (n=37). In the IL-group, participants were trained in “single-rescuer, adult CPR” according to the American Heart Association's Basic Life Support course for healthcare providers. In the VAM group, all subjects received a 20-minute lesson about CPR. After the lesson, each student trained individually with the VAM for 1 hour, receiving real-time feedback. After the training, all subjects were evaluated as they performed basic CPR (30 compressions, 2 ventilations) for 4 minutes. RESULTS: The proportion of participants with a mean compression depth ≥50 mm was 34.1% in the IL group and 27.0% in the VAM group, and the proportion with a mean compression depth ≥40 mm had increased significantly in both groups compared with ≥50 mm (IL group, 82.9%; VAM group, 86.5%). However, no significant differences were detected between the groups in this regard. The proportion of ventilations of the appropriate volume was relatively low in both groups (IL group, 26.4%; VAM group, 12.5%; P=0.396). CONCLUSION: Both methods, the IL training using a practice-while-watching video and the VAM training, facilitated initial CPR skill acquisition, especially in terms of correct chest compression.
