The pattern of movement and stress distribution during retraction of maxillary incisors using a 3-D finite element method.
- Author:
Ae jin CHUNG
1
;
Un Su KIM
;
Soo Haeng LEE
;
Seong Soo KANG
;
Hee In CHOI
;
Jin Hyung JO
;
Sang Cheol KIM
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Wonkwang University, Koera. sangkim@wku.ac.kr.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Retraction of anterior teeth;
3-D finite element analysis;
Stress distribution;
Corticotomy
- MeSH:
Arm;
Bicuspid;
Humans;
Incisor*;
Molar;
Skull;
Sutures;
Tooth;
Tooth Movement
- From:Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2007;37(2):98-113
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the displacement pattern and the stress distribution shown on a finite element model 3-D visualization of a dry human skull using CT during the retraction of upper anterior teeth. METHODS: Experimental groups were differentiated into 8 groups according to corticotomy, anchorage (buccal: mini implant between the maxillary second premolar and first molar and second premolar reinforced with a mini implant, palatal: mini implant between the maxillary first molar and second molar and mini implant on the midpalatal suture) and force application point (use of a power arm or not). RESULTS: In cases where anterior teeth were retracted by a conventional T-loop arch wire, the anterior teeth tipped more postero-inferiorly and the posterior teeth moved slightly in a mesial direction. In cases where anterior teeth were retracted with corticotomy, the stress at the anterior bone segment was distributed widely and showed a smaller degree of tipping movement of the anterior teeth, but with a greater amount of displacement. In cases where anterior teeth were retracted from the buccal side with force applied to the mini implant placed between the maxillary second premolar and the first molar to the canine power arm, it showed that a smaller degree of tipping movement was generated than when force was applied to the second premolar reinforced with a mini implant from the canine bracket. In cases where anterior teeth were retracted from the palatal side with force applied to the mini implant on the midpalatal suture, it resulted in a greater degree of tipping movement than when force was applied to the mini implant between the maxillary first and second molars. CONCLUSION: The results of this study verifies the effects of corticotomies and the effects of controlling orthodontic force vectors during tooth movement.
