Friction of calcium phosphate brackets to stainless steel wire.
- Author:
Hyo Jin JOO
1
;
Young Guk PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyunghee University. ygpark@khu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Frictional resistance;
Calcium phosphate bracket;
Simulated biological model
- MeSH:
Calcium*;
Ceramics;
Friction*;
Models, Biological;
Stainless Steel*;
Tooth
- From:Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2007;37(5):376-385
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
OBJECTIVE: Esthetic brackets which resemble the color of natural teeth have been widely used. But the frictional resistance of ceramic brackets, a typical esthetic bracket, is greater than that of metal brackets. The purpose of this study was to measure the frictional resistance of the new calcium phosphate brackets (CPB) which were recently developed and to evaluate its clinical usability by comparing the frictional differences of CPB with metal brackets and metal slot inserted ceramic brackets. METHODS: Experimental groups were CPB (Hyaline II, Tomy, Tokyo, Japan), metal bracket (Kosaka, Tomy, Tokyo, Japan) and metal slot inserted ceramic bracket (Clarity, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). All of the brackets had 0.022-inch slot sizes. The brackets were tested with 0.019 x 0.025 inch stainless steel wire (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA). A biologic model was used to simulate the situation which would occur during orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Retraction force was applied at a speed of 5 mm/min for 30 seconds. The frictional resistance was measured on a universal testing machine (Instron 4467, Instron, Norwood, MA, USA). RESULTS: CPB showed significantly higher friction than metal brackets (p < 0.05) and lower friction than metal slot inserted ceramic brackets (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CPB can be considered to be a useful orthodontic esthetic bracket with respect to frictional resistance, as its friction is remarkably lower than that of metal slot inserted ceramic brackets.
