The comparison of landmark identification errors and reproducibility between conventional lateral cephalometric radiography and digital lateral cephalometric radiography.
- Author:
Yang Ku LEE
1
;
Young Il CHANG
;
Won Sik YANG
Author Information
1. Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Korea. drchang@snu.ac.kr
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Conventional lateral cephalometric radiography;
Digital lateral cephalometric radiography;
Landmark;
Error
- MeSH:
Adult;
Humans;
Radiography*
- From:Korean Journal of Orthodontics
2002;32(2):79-89
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the reproducibility and errors in landmark identification of conventional lateral cephalometric radiography and digital lateral cephalometric radiography. Fifteen conventional lateral cephalometric radiographs and fifteen digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were selected in adults with no considerations on sex and craniofacial forms. Each landmark was identified and expressed as the coordinate (x, y). The landmarks were classified into 3 groups. The landmarks of the first identification was T1, identification after one week was T2, and identification after one month was T3. The mean and standard deviation of identification errors between replicates were calculated according to the x and y coordinates. The errors between first identification and second identification were expressed as T2-T1(x), T2-T1(y) and those between first identification and third identification were expressed as T3-T1(x), T2-T1(y). Each was divided into conventional lateral cephalometric radiography and digital lateral cephalometric radiography. The independent t-test was used for statistical analysis of identification errors for the evaluation of reproducibility. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Generally, the mean and standard deviation of landmark identification errors in digital lateral cephalometric radiography was smaller than those of conventional lateral cephalometric radiography. 2. Only a few landmarks showed statistically significant difference in identification error between conventional lateral cephalometric radiography and digital lateral cephalometric radiography. 3. The enhancement of image quality didn't guarantee decrease in landmark identification error and didn't affect tendency of landmark identification error.
