Comparison of Olfactory Threshold Tests:CCCRC Test versus Step Method.
- Author:
Kyung Hun YANG
1
;
Ic Tae KIM
;
Young Min PARK
Author Information
1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hallym University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Olfactory threshold;
Psychophysical method;
CCCRC test;
Step method
- MeSH:
Bias (Epidemiology);
Nose;
Odors
- From:Korean Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
1997;40(3):389-396
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
There are many variables that can be manipulated in the study of olfactory thresholds. They include the choice of odorant, the way to bring the stimulus to the subject's nose, number of trials, interval between trials, dilution method, environmental conditions, as well as psychophysical method. The focus of this study lay on how much differences were made by the psychophysical method, the sequence of presentations of stimuli that led to calculation of an index of sensitivity and how reliable the result of step method in olfactory threshold testing is. The olfactory threshold tests entailed comparison of procedures: 1) a procedure of two-alternative forced-choice(2AFC) testing by an ascending method of limits(CCCRC test), 2) a two-alternative forced-choice(2AFC) version of step method that used a computerized algorithm to calculate threshold on an ongoing basis throughout testing. As a result, mean concentration difference of 7.6-fold was achieved in the thresholds by the two procedures and inter-test correlation coefficient was 0.46. Estimation of threshold in the step method remained relatively constant after 10 trials to the end of the 30 test-trials without biases, which meant step method showed coherent data. Accordingly step method is suitable for olfactory threshold test despite of relatively long testing time.
