Comparison dominant eye and anisometropia by Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test
10.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2014.08.29
- VernacularTitle:用卡洞法和Worth四点法检测优势眼与屈光参差的相关性
- Author:
Nian, GUAN
;
Zhi-Guang, HU
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
ocular domiance;
anisometropia;
hole-in-the-card test;
Worth 4 dot test
- From:
International Eye Science
2014;(8):1476-1477
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
ATM: To investigate the relationship between the oculus dominans and the eye with higher diopter among myopes, and to study the difference between the Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test.
METHODS: Totally 125 cases were divided into two groups as physiogenic anisometropic group and pathological anisomitropic group according to the degree of binoculus anisometropy. Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test were used to distinguish oculus dominans respectively based on medical optometry.
RESULTS: In physiogenic anisometropic group, the oculus dominans and the eye with higher diopter among myopes had significant relationship by hole-in-the-card test (Z = -4. 057, P<0. 01) and Worth 4 dot test (Z=-3. 558, P<0. 01). However, in pathological group, No statistical significance was between two tests (P>0. 05); distinguish the oculus dominans had no statistically significant difference between the Worth 4 dot test and hole-in-the-card test (n=125, P>0. 05).
CONCLUSION:The oculus dominans is determined by gene or formed during juvenile period, then myopia anisometropic may affect the choice of that. The Worth 4 dot test has some reference significance for observing oculus dominans.
