- Author:
Inuk HWANG
1
;
Dong Wook SHIN
;
Kyoung Hee KANG
;
Hyung Kook YANG
;
So Young KIM
;
Jong Hyock PARK
Author Information
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords: Neoplasms; Terminal care; Health care costs
- MeSH: Analgesics; Comorbidity; Delivery of Health Care*; Drug Costs; Epidemiology; Fees and Charges; Health Care Costs; Humans; Korea; Leukemia; National Health Programs; Psychotherapy; Rehabilitation; Terminal Care; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
- From:Cancer Research and Treatment 2016;48(1):365-375
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:English
- Abstract: PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cancer care cost during the last year of life of patients in Korea. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the breakdown of spending on the components of cancer care. Cancer decedents in 2009 were identified from the Korean Central Cancer Registry and linked with the Korean National Health Insurance Claims Database. The final number of patients included in the study was 70,558. RESULTS: In 2009, the average cancer care cost during the last year of life was US $15,720. Patients under age 20 spent US $53,890 while those 70 or over spent US $11,801. Those with leukemia incurred the highest costs (US $43,219) while bladder cancer patients spent the least (US $13,155). General costs, drugs other than analgesics, and test fees were relatively high (29.7%, 23.8%, and 20.7% of total medical costs, respectively). Analgesic drugs, rehabilitation, and psychotherapy were still relatively low (4.3%, 0.7%, and 0.1%, respectively). Among the results of multiple regression analysis, few were notable. Age was found to be negatively related to cancer care costs while income level was positively associated. Those classified under distant Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results stages of cancer and higher comorbidity level also incurred higher cancer care costs. CONCLUSION: Average cancer care costs varied significantly by patient characteristics. However, the study results suggest an underutilization of support services likely due to lack of alternative accommodations for terminal cancer patients. Further examination of utilization patterns of healthcare resources will help provide tailored evidence for policymakers in efforts to reduce the burdens of cancer care.