Clinical observation of palpebral spring placement for lagophthalmos secondary to facial nerve palsy
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2014.08.015
- VernacularTitle:金属弹簧丝植入治疗面神经麻痹性眼睑闭合不全
- Author:
Li, ZHANG
;
Fa, AARON
;
Feng, XING
;
Liya, WANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Blepharoplasty/method;
Facial paralysis/surgery;
Lagophthalmos;
Eyelid/surgery;
Prostheses and implant;
Palpebral spring placement;
Retrospective study
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology
2014;32(8):739-742
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Background The dysfunction of the blink reflex the eyelid-closure ability appears in the patients with facial paralysis,and its management is the implantation of mechanical-assisted eye-closure device in the upper eyelid.A novel device is palpebral spring implant.However,there is no similar study in China.Objective This study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy of palpebral spring placement for lagophthalmos caused by facial nerve palsy.Methods This clinical research complied with Helsinki declaration and the protocol was approved by Ethic Committee of Henan Eye Institute & Henan Eye Hospital.Written informed consent was obtained from each patient prior to the surgery.A retrospective serial case-observational study was performed.The medical records of 11 patients who underwent palpebral spring placement for hypophasis due to facial nerve palsy were reviewed at Henan Eye Hospital from August 2010 to November 2012.Palpebral spring placement was performed by the same surgeon to ensure a more even outcomes.Palpebral spring was made by nickel wire,with the diameter of 0.3 mm and implanted on tarsal plate in 11 eyes of 11 patients with symptomatic facial nerve palsy.The lower tip of Levine spring was encased into a small terylene bag and sutured to the anterior tarsal surface during the surgery.Preoperative and postoperative symptoms,upper eyelid margin to mid pupil distance (ULMD),degree of lagophthalmos and eyelid moving scope were examined and compared between before and after operation.The operating complication was followed-up for 8-38 months.Results The discomforted symptoms disappeared in all the operated eyes.The ULMD was (3.51±0.73) mm in preoperation and (3.20±0.86) mm in posteration,without significant difference between them (t=1.36,P=0.10).The degree of lagophthalmos was (5.94±1.57) mm and (1.06±0.98) mm in preoperation and postoperation respectively,showing a significant difference between them (t =9.42,P =0.00).The eyelid moving scope was (5.89±0.70) mm in postoperation,which was significantly increased in comparison with (0.11 ±0.33) mm of preoperation (t =22.97,P =0.00).The palpebral spring implant was regulated in 1 patient during the follow-up duration due to the trauma.No complication in other 10 patients appeared during the follow-up duration,such as implant exposure,metal fatigue or infection.Conclusions Palpebral spring placement is safe and effective for lagophthalmos in patients with facial nerve palsy.
