Assessment of left ventricular function in patients with aortic regurgitation using tow-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography
10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2013.09.009
- VernacularTitle:二维斑点追踪技术对主动脉瓣反流患者左心室功能的评价
- Author:
Chen-yang, WANG
;
Chun-lei, LI
;
Hong-yun, LIU
;
Dan, JIN
;
You-bin, DENG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Echocardiography,Doppler;
Aortic valve insufficiency;
Ventricular function,left
- From:
Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition)
2013;(9):31-35
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Objective Analyse the change of left ventricular (LV) longitudinal and radial strain in patients with aortic regurgitation (AR) and discuss the relationship between the 2D strain parameter and the filling and ejection of LV. Methods Thirty healthy controls and 45 patients with AR (24 patients with moderate AR and 21 with severe AR) were enrolled in this study, LV systolic global peak radial strain(GRS), systolic global peak longitudinal strain(GLS) and systolic peak longitudinal strain(S), systolic peak longitudinal strain rate(SRs), early diastolic peak longitudinal strain rate(SRe) of every segment were measured or calculated using 2D-STE, early and late diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E, A) were recorded by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and early diastolic mitral annular velocity (Ea) were assessed by tissue Doppler imaging,the E/A and E/Ea ratio were calculated. Discuss the relationship of GLS and LV ejection fraction (LVEF), GLS and E/Ea using the Pearson correlation analysis. Results The GLS were (-20.09±1.47)%, (-18.68±1.52)%, (-12.56±3.25)%and the GRS were (46.71±7.65)%, (43.01±5.95)%, (28.52±6.13)% in control group, patients with moderate and severe AR (MAR group and SAR group) respectively. There were significant differences among the groups (F =82.08,47.69, both P < 0.01) as following:SAR group with control group and MAR group [ q=17.56,13.60 (GLS), q=13.44, 10.20 (GRS), all P<0.01),MAR group and control group [ q=3.42 (GLS), P<0.01]. The SRs of the apical segment were (-1.24±0.22)s-1, (-1.19±0.25)s-1, (-1.04±0.28)s-1 in control group,MAR group and SAR group respectively. There were significant differences among the groups (F=4.47, P < 0.05) as following:SAR group with control group and MAR group ( q=4.02,3.28, both P<0.01). The S, SRe of apical segment and the S,SRs,SRe of basal and midventricular in MAR group were all lower than the control group ( q=4.42, 5.01, 3.48, 3.24, 4.78, 4.12, 3.61, 6.72, all P < 0.01). Pearson correlation analysis revealed the GLS had a relationship with LVEF and E/Ea ( r=-0.73, 0.64, both P<0.01). Conclusion The reduced longitudinal strain and strain rate could detect LV dysfunction in patients with AR in early stage and the GLS had the ability to reflect the diastolic filling and systolic ejecting of the LV.
