Comparison of intraocular pressure measured by Icare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer
10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-0160.2011.05.016
- VernacularTitle:Icare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计眼压测量结果的比较
- Author:
He-zheng, ZHOU
;
Shao-yang, ZHANG
;
Wen-shan, JIANG
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Icare rebound tonometer;
Intraocular pressure;
Central corneal thickniss
- From:
Chinese Journal of Experimental Ophthalmology
2011;29(5):456-459
- CountryChina
- Language:Chinese
-
Abstract:
Background As a new tonometer,it is necessary to assess the clinical value of Icare rebound tonometer.Objective This study was to compare the intraocular pressure(IOP)values measured by Icare with that measured by GAT,and discuss the clinical value of leare rebound tonometer. Methods IOP measurement was performed on 152 eyes of 78 subjects with suspicious glaucoma,glaucoma,refractive error and normal examinnee by Icare and GAT respectively.The Icare IOP was measured firstly and then the GAT IOP was carried out with the 3-or 5-minute interval.The IOP values were compared between Ieare and GAT.This study was approved by Ethic Committee of Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese PLA.Written informed consent was obtained from each subject prior to this study. Results The mean IOP values of Icare and GAT were(19.16±5.03)mmHg and(18.41±4.52)mmHg respectively.The differences between Icare IOP and CAT IOP were less than or equal to 1 mmHg in 96 of 105 eyes(63.2%).The positive correlation was found between the Icare IOP and GAT IOP(r=0.940,P<0.01).The Ieare IOP was lower than that of GAT when IOPIcare<16 mmHg,however,the IOP of Icare were higher when IOPIcare≥6 mmHg;the IOP of Icare were higher than that of GAT in the total CCT range.The correlation coefficients of IOP of Icare or CAT with CCT were 0.341(P<0.01)and 0.333(P<0.01),respectively. Conclusion Compared with GAT,Icare is more feasible in clinic because it is practicable and reliable.
