Timolol versus latanoprost for primary open-angle glaucoma
- Author:
FlorCruz Nilo Vince
;
Peczon Ildefonso V
;
Lim-Bon-Siong Ruben
;
Tumbocon Joseph Ant
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- MeSH:
TIMOLOL
- From:
Philippine Journal of Ophthalmology
2005;30(2):82-84
- CountryPhilippines
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
CLINICAL SCENARIO: A 46-year-old male consulted for refraction. Best-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 for both eyes (OU), Jaeger 1 for near. Slit-lamp examination was normal. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was 25 mm Hg OU. Gonioscopy revealed iridocorneal angles that were open up to the ciliary body band OU. Funduscopy revealed clear media with no exudates or hemorrhages in the retina. Cup-disc ratio was 0.7 vertically and 0.6 horizontally with notching of the inferotemporal neuroretinal rim OU. Automated visual-field examination showed superior arcuate scotomas OU with no threat to fixation. The working diagnosis upon consultation was primary open-angle glaucoma. After all treatment options had been explained to the patient, a trial of medical therapy was chosen. Given the severity of the glaucoma, a target IOP range was initially set at 15 to 17 mm Hg. Nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers and prostaglandin analogues are two classes of medications that will most probably lower the IOP to the desired levels CLINICAL QUESTION: Among patients undergoing initial medical therapy for primary open-angle glaucoma, would latanoprost be more effective in lowering the IOP compared with timolol? SEARCH METHOD: An electronic literature search was performed using Medline (PubMed). The key words used were "latanoprost" and "timolol." The search was further limited to randomized clinical trials or metaanalysis published in the English language. Table 1 shows the search process performed The search was narrowed down to 5 articles. Abstracts of the articles were reviewed. One article employed ocular hypertensive subjects while another compared brimonidine and timolol. These studies were, therefore, excluded. Among all the metaanalyses obtained from the search, Zhang et al.s had the most number of subjects and outcome measures. It was for this reason that the article was chosen for appraisal in resolving the clinical scenario. (Author)
