Study result of the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture
- VernacularTitle:Коллес хугарлын эвийн эмчилгээнд нөлөөлөх эрсдэлт хүчин зүйлийг судалсан дүн
- Author:
Bulgan Ts
;
Baasanjav N
;
Baatarjav S
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
colles fracture;
Nondisplaced;
Displaced;
Distal radius bone
- From:Mongolian Medical Sciences
2016;176(2):25-29
- CountryMongolia
- Language:Mongolian
-
Abstract:
Introduction
Irish surgeon Abraham Coll bone lower forearm Call an end in 1814 reports about the location
extension breaks, fractures, called colles fractures. It is common fractures account for 10-20% of the
total respectively fracture, the bottom end 75% of bone fracture forearm. Number of elderly patients
in developed countries has increased, an increasing number of these refractive growth. In 2001, in
the cases of 640,000 fracture United States forearm bone bottom colles.
Purpose
Study for the influence of risk factors in bone setting treatment Colles fracture
Objectives:
1. Forearm bone assessment bottom Colles displaced, some of the causes which affect
nondisplaced fractures, depending upon risk factors
2. Forearm bone to assess what the lower end Colles healing some of the risk factors that may
affect the fracture
Materials and Methods
Trauma and Orthopedic research studies involving the term “Emergency Department” at the forearms
of 80 people age 5-76 bone treatment in patients who received the peace at the lower end Colles
fracture the national center. Respondents grooming, nongrooming divided into 2 groups, which may
not be received and confirmed by refractive index difference in X-ray. To analyze the data elements
of descriptive statistics was used (mean, standard deviation, percentage distribution). As a result of
calculating the difference between the data expressed as a percentage Use Pearson’s chi-squares
method. If using T-test method to calculate the difference between the data and the P value less
than 0.05 considered statistically accurate. Calculating the relationship between the power of the
data evaluated the relationship using spearman correlation coefficient.
Result
Some of the causes and risk factors are compared between groups, Colles difference nondisplaced
fracture purity (r=0.18, p=0.21) or a weak relationship, Colles difference, compared to the
nondisplaced fracture the use of calcium supplementation (r=0.21, p=0.06) associations, Colles
difference, gender nondisplaced fracture compared (r=0.28, p=0.01) weaknesses related were
statistically significant.
Conclusion
1. Colles difference nondisplaced fractures when used in alcohol risk factors affect the injury took
place, and menopause are diagnosed with osteoporosis, previous calcium intake is associated with
weak damage.
2. Colles difference refraction healing has 24-hour loss of time covered detonations often bear
physical therapy show his hand and damaged a hospital that affect healing.
- Full text:P020170419837709932965.pdf
