Labour Induction With Randomized Comparison Of Oral And Intravaginal Misoprostol In Post Date Multigravida Women
- Author:
Aqueela Ayaz
;
Shazia Saeed
;
Mian Usman Farooq
;
Iftikhar Ahmad
;
Muhammad Luqman Ali Bahoo
;
Muhammad Saeed
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
Misoprostol, induction, labor, medical sciences
- From:Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences
2009;16(1):34-38
- CountryMalaysia
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
The efficacy and safety of oral versus vaginal misoprostol for elective induction of labor in post
date multigravida with an unfavourable cervix was compared over a period of one year in the Bahawal
Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Eightyeight multigravida post date women were divided into
two groups and given 50 mg misoprostol orally and 50 mg intravaginally, respectively. The induction
to onset of significant uterine contractions and delivery intervals were lower in the first group (7.8 h
vs. 8.9 h) when compared to (10.4 h vs. 12 h). The first group had a higher rate of Caesarean section
(7% vs. 4%; p>0.05), uterine hyperstimulation (9% vs. 5%; p>0.05), uterine tachysystole (23% vs. 14%;
p>0.05) and neonatal admissions to intensive care unit (12% vs. 4%; p>0.05) when compared to second
group. Fifty mg oral misoprostol has the potential to induce labor as safely and effectively as the
intravaginal route.
- Full text:W020151021602307315336.pdf
