Intake Interview Procedure For The Selection Of Undergraduate Students In Malaysian Medical Schools: Inter-Ratter Reliability Of Quality Assessment
- Author:
Shahid Hassan
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
inter-ratter reliability;
reliability coefficient;
structured interview procedure;
interviewing skills
- From:Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine
2016;16(3):1-7
- CountryMalaysia
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
Comparable selection methods based on interview as one of the selection criteria are used in many countries globally however; procedure of interview and its reliability has been of varying nature. A semi-structured interview procedure was developed by the Faculty of Medicine at Universiti Sultan ZainalAbidin to finally select the shortlisted candidates seeking to studying medicine in this institution as the new intake of 2015-2016 sessions of MBBS program. Multiple panels comprising of two members each to independently select the candidate held interview. Inter-ratter reliability of quality assessment was investigated. Current article investigates the inter-ratter reliability of interviewers in quality assessment of candidates seeking to join the Faculty of Medicine at Universiti Sultan ZainalAbidin, Malaysia. An observational study, conducted across all the candidates, who were shortlisted on merit for formal selection through interview procedure. Data reflecting candidates’ characteristics and qualities were collected as quantitative score. Inter-ratter reliability using intra class coefficient was calculated for interpretation. A moderate difference of mean (SD) among the interviewer varying from 37.61 (3.48) to 42.12 (0.60) was observed. The reliability of score varied between 0.50- 0.65, significant at p = < 0.05 with majority assessors. However, among the 4 panels of assessors’ intra-class correlation coefficient was between 0.70-0.0.90 (p = < 0.001). Assessment of candidates’ performance based on observation did not achieve the satisfactory level of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC ≥ 0.70). However for higher discrepancy in inter-ratter scores in some cases, continuing faculty development program in interviewing skills and calibration workshops are recommended to improve the reliability and validity of quality selection through interview procedure in future.
- Full text:P020160315569872854406.pdf
