Socio-Economic Impact of HIV/AIDs and Mental Health
- Author:
Syed Mohamed Aljunid
- Publication Type:Journal Article
- Keywords:
socio-economic;
HIV/AIDs;
mental health;
impact
- From:Malaysian Journal of Public Health Medicine
2012;12(Supplement 1):12-12
- CountryMalaysia
- Language:English
-
Abstract:
HIV/AIDS and Mental Health are two chronic diseases with huge economic burden in developing countries. For HIV/AIDS, this year marked three decades since HIV/AIDs first identified with more than 34 million people in the world are living with this chronic condition with 2.6 million new cases.
More than 90% of cases are adult in their economically productive life and nearly half are women. Even though HIV/AIDs incidence fell by more than 25% in 33 countries for the last ten years, the existing burden is still huge. Africa, the least resource continent in the world bears most of the brunt of this chronic condition housing nearly two thirds of global HIV positive cases. It is estimated that the available resources for HIV/AIDs in 2009 is USD 15.9 billion, there is a shortage of nearly USD10 billion. Only one third of these countries make HIV/AIDs a high budgetary priority. Mental illness is a chronic non-communicable disease responsible for 37% of global healthy life years lost. It was also estimated that in 25% of the patients visiting any health facilities, at least one suffer from undiagnosed mental health, neurological or behavioural disorder. The current global cost of mental health is estimated at USD 2.5 trillion. This will increase to USD 6.1 trillion in 2030. More than two thirds of this cost is indirect cost mostly due to loss in productivity. Managing these two conditions posed great challenges to low and middle income countries. Huge economic burden means that additional source of funding should be sought with full participation of all stakeholders. Mobilizing resources at the community level should be seriously considered. Support for community to provide long term care for HIV/Aids and mental health patients should be adequately supported by governments through properly targeted and well organized programme. Incentives and disincentives to influence efficient and effective performance should be put in place with innovative financing approach.
Vertical programme should be avoided while more integrated approach with significant task shifting should be given a priority to ensure success and sustainability. In conclusion, policy makers in low and middle income countries should take positive measures to ensure that HIV/Aids and mental health is properly addressed by mobilising efforts from all stakeholders.
