Diagnosis of Causative Fungi of Onychomycosis Using Polymerase Chain Reaction and Restriction Enzyme Analysis.
- Author:
Hee Jae CHAE
1
;
Seung Cheol BAEK
;
Baik Kee CHO
Author Information
1. Department of Dermatology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
- Publication Type:Original Article
- Keywords:
Onychomycosis;
Polymerase chain reaction;
Restriction enzyme analysis
- MeSH:
Arthrodermataceae;
Candida albicans;
Cerebrospinal Fluid;
Conserved Sequence;
Diagnosis*;
DNA;
DNA, Fungal;
Fungi*;
Guanidine;
Humans;
Onychomycosis*;
Polymerase Chain Reaction*;
Restriction Mapping*;
Ribosome Subunits, Small;
Sensitivity and Specificity;
Sputum;
Trichophyton;
Yeasts
- From:Korean Journal of Medical Mycology
1999;4(1):6-14
- CountryRepublic of Korea
- Language:Korean
-
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis has become one of the common fungal infection. However, highly reliable and sensitive methods of detecting and identifying causative fungi of onychomycosis are not established yet. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of clinical specimens including blood, sputum, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid collected from patient systemically infected fungus is known as a sensitive diagnostic method. But it has been questionable whether PCR analysis is also applicable to onychomycosis. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a DNA-based diagnostic method to improve the sensitivity and specificity of detection and identification of pathogenic fungi of onychomycosis. METHODS: To detect the fungi in the nail, PCR was performed by using 4 sets of primer (TR1 & TR2, NS5 & NS6, B2F & B4R and CA1 & CA2) designed in conserved sequences of the small ribosomal subunit (185-rRNA) genes and restriction enzyme analysis of amplified product by Hae III was done to identify species. Nail specimens were obtained from 19 cases of onychomycosis confirm by fungus culture. RESULTS: 1. Preparation of nail powder, which is necessary for removal of keratin, and composition of lysis buffer with guanidinium thiocyanate, Tris-HCl, and beta -mercaptoethanol are the most proper modalities for isolation of fungal DNA from fungus-infesting nails. 2. Specific fragments of the 18S-rRNA gene of fungi, 581 bp, 308 bp, 688 bp and 1106 bp were amplified respectively. From sequences of 18S-rRNA gene of fungi by universal primers, dermatophytes (Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes) and yeast (Candida albicans) yielded identical products. 3. Using Hae III endonuclease, digested patterns of fragment of Trichophyton rubrum and Candida albicans resulted in different pattern. CONCLUSION: This method released enough DNA from fungus-infected nails to result in proper amplification and it can be possible to differentiate dermatophytes, yeasts, and molds using Hae III endonuclease. The present study is the first one to demonstrate the feasibility of this molecular biologic approach to identify fungi in the infected nail. Therefore, precise detection and identification of the causative fungi would be of help in investigating distribution of the causative fungi of onychomycosis as well as appropriate treatment of the disease.
